A time for Liberal and Conservative optimism?

screen-shot-2016-10-29-at-4-38-05-pm

Overwhelmed by the election, I find myself itching to get back to the issues (woefully absent in the debates and punditry).

One of those issues is around climate change, and more specifically, my optimism in young Republicans who tend to acknowledge that climate change is real, and who are interested in finding solutions. This cohort effect could turn tides on climate policy, as it did recently for gay marriage, and, in part, for women’s rights and civil rights in earlier eras.

A study commissioned by the Young Conservatives for Energy Reform reports that four out of five young Republicans polled think the climate is changing, and two-thirds blame human activity, in part or entirely. Moreover, as the Huffington Post reports, 73 percent have a favorable view of the clean-energy industry, and 59 percent have a positive view of the Environmental Protection Agency. And the Washington Post reports that young Republicans, compared to their older counterparts, are more willing to support action on climate change, including government regulation.

In the broader scheme of things, young Republicans are contributing to the political shift on climate policy by forcing the GOP to reconsider its tenor. Combined with the Pope’s encyclical calling for climate action, the Republican party is seeming more and more out of step with the public by dismissing climate change as a liberal hoax.

A recent poll published in Scientific American estimates that more than four out of five registered voters now support additional funding for energy sources like wind and solar and support giving tax rebates for the purchase of energy-efficient cars and solar panels. Three in four support the regulation of carbon dioxide. While those numbers are more heavily influenced by Democratic voters, young Republicans are helping to narrow those margins.

Interestingly enough, this hope in young Republicans is mirrored in today’s NYTimes column by long-time conservative, David Brooks. Perhaps not exactly the same reform agenda that I might espouse, he does note that: “Most young conservatives are comfortable with ethnic diversity and are weary of the Fox News media-politico complex.” Moreover, he believes in a return to intellection discussions on the role of government, not just its destruction, and thinks that young Republicans do, too.

So here’s to a brighter future for liberals and conservatives. If our younger generation can fight for solutions to climate change, government partisanship and some of the rest, there just may be room for optimism amidst the current political crisis.

[Relevant NYTimes article post-election]

Pragmatic conservative voices

screen-shot-2016-10-26-at-4-07-08-pm paul-ryan

An important difference between Michael Shertoff and Paul Ryan is that one was pragmatic, the other merely political.

In such an acrimonious presidential race, and in the context of a deeply divided country, it’s easy to get wrapped up in partisanship and lose perspective on what we might be celebrating.

Paul Ryan’s news this morning, for example, that he will no longer defend Trump admittedly brought me personal satisfaction, knowing the effect it will have on Trump’s campaign and the GOP prospects for this election. Similarly, the 2005 Trump video that went viral was a huge blow to Trump’s credibility and significantly diminishes his likelihood of taking the White House. Both mean that my party is more likely to win.

But these kinds of Democratic political gains aren’t something to celebrate in and of themselves. The first is merely a political maneuver that sadly comes quite late and doesn’t change Ryan’s endorsement for Trump. The second, an intolerable offense to women, and men, everywhere.

As we near election day, nasty politics and politicking are only going to intensify, and it’s going to be ever easier to get caught up in the partisan battles and celebrate wins or defeats without keeping perspective on the underlying issues, values, and processes. In other words, when the character of our country is at stake, the means, not just the ends, still matter.

All the more reason to keep sight of and recognize those pragmatic voices, especially conservatives, and conservative institutions, who have been outspoken against Trump’s presidential bid, not just for political reasons or partisan wins, but as sensible (voices of) citizens.

An Oct 8 report from the Washington Post captures the growing list of individual Republicans endorsing Clinton/ denouncing Trump. Some notable pragmatists who see Trump as the incompetent and dangerous demagogue for what he is include:

  • Much to his credit, 2012 GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney was one of the first to stand up and speak out against Trump’s candidacy.
  • More recently, Michael Shertoff, former Homeland Security Secretary who has been an arch nemesis of the Clintons, spoke pragmatically about the imperative to put partisanship aside and focus on the issues, especially homeland security. “Which of the two would be better for president?… I’m planning to vote for Hillary Clinton.”
  • Lezlee Westine, a former aide to President George W. Bush, stated: “Our nation faces a unique set of challenges that require steady and experienced leadership… That is why today I am personally supporting Hillary Clinton.”
  • Michael Morell, a former acting CIA director — who served in both Republican and Democratic administrations — wrote a scathing denunciation of Trump in his endorsement of Clinton.

Several newspapers, too, have come out denouncing Trump as dangerous and unfit, if not in full support of Hillary. Some of those are unprecedented, most notably USAToday; others include those that rarely endorse Democrats, such as The Arizona RepublicThe Desert SunThe Dallas Morning News, and The Houston Chronicle. (Full list of newspaper editorial board endorsements here.)

Pragmatic and enabling voices like these are an important means to sustaining a country of democratic values (and prevents us from becoming something that looks more like an authoritarian, Mugabe-like state). Fortunately, many pragmatists, even if not as many as we might hope, are rising to the occasion.

DNC: the true LiberalOptimist venue

Screen Shot 2016-08-04 at 11.07.52 AM

The Democratic National Convention was brimming with optimism, hope, pragmatism, and the theme of “Stronger Together.”

Barack Obama may have captured these sentiments best, delivering an inspirational speech:

“The America I know is full of courage, and optimism, and ingenuity. The America I know is decent and generous… America has always been about what can be achieved by us, together, through the hard, slow, sometimes frustrating, but ultimately enduring work of self-government. And that’s what Hillary Clinton understands.”

More substantively, he spoke of what’s been accomplished during his presidency: jobs, healthcare, etc. This blog post captures 371 accomplishments under his presidency, accomplishments easily overlooked in today’s political climate.

Other highlights from the Democratic National Convention:

Utah conservative apologizes to L.G.B.T.Q.I. community

Spencer Cox, a conservative Utah politician, gave this moving speech about his change of heart. We are all human after all. And he reminds us that calling each other “communists”, “fascists” and “bigots” isn’t going to change hearts and minds, let alone policy.