Progressive win: upping the minimum wage

screen-shot-2016-11-27-at-7-29-38-pm

The presidential and congressional election results, for obvious reason, deeply overshadowed any of the progressive wins in this election. But there are a few that are worth highlighting so that we don’t lose sight of some hopeful trends underway.

Minimum wage: Four states just voted to up their minimum wage: Arizona, Colorado, Maine and Washington, each representing a 40-60% increase from the current rate. This follows from approved ballot initiatives in California and Washington DC earlier this year, all of which ultimately led to higher pay for roughly 8 million working Americans and paid sick days for 1.9 million, according to the Fairness Project. (An additional 14 states saw wage increases at the beginning of 2016, as scheduled.)

Moreover, 15 cities are currently committed and moving towards a $15 minimum wage, and several states and cities are set to put minimum wage measures up for a vote in the next year or two.

These recent gains are reflective of a generally supportive climate for increasing the minimum wage, across partisan lines. During the 2014 mid-term elections, as CNN reports, four red-leaning states: Alaska, Arkansas, Nebraska and South Dakota, all approved minimum wage increases. Since 2000, in fact, at least 15 minimum wage initiatives have been on the ballot; all of them have passed, and often with wide margins. Support for these measures reflects the general public sentiment: an estimated 6 in 10 Americans back the more progressive $15 minimum wage, according to a 2015 poll by the National Employment Law Project.

These local and state-level initiatives are important for several reasons, the most salient of which is that a federal minimum wage increase has been stagnated by partisan politics, and has left millions of Americans well behind. The Economic Policy Institute estimates that today’s federal minimum wage (at $7.25) is nearly a quarter lower than its 1960s inflation-adjusted value. In other words, the federal lag is contributing to today’s widening economic inequality, and increasing reliance on federal safety net programs.

Jobs too: there’s also evidence that higher minimum wages can help to spur job growth, even as reported by Fox news in 2014 following wage increases across several states.

Trending hikes in minimum wages, including in this election, is a positive and progressive way forward for the country.

DNC: the true LiberalOptimist venue

Screen Shot 2016-08-04 at 11.07.52 AM

The Democratic National Convention was brimming with optimism, hope, pragmatism, and the theme of “Stronger Together.”

Barack Obama may have captured these sentiments best, delivering an inspirational speech:

“The America I know is full of courage, and optimism, and ingenuity. The America I know is decent and generous… America has always been about what can be achieved by us, together, through the hard, slow, sometimes frustrating, but ultimately enduring work of self-government. And that’s what Hillary Clinton understands.”

More substantively, he spoke of what’s been accomplished during his presidency: jobs, healthcare, etc. This blog post captures 371 accomplishments under his presidency, accomplishments easily overlooked in today’s political climate.

Other highlights from the Democratic National Convention:

Bernie forced the issue of inequality

Screen Shot 2016-08-02 at 2.25.58 PM

Whether you’re a Feel the Bern kind of person or supported Hillary throughout, we should all agree that Bernie brought an important issue to the conversation that had otherwise been largely ignored in institutionalized politics: economic inequality.

The Tea Party Movement that began in 2009 started as something of a populist revolt, though skeptics, and rightfully so, also saw the big money behind it: The Billionaire’s Tea Party. All the same, by 2010, dozens of self-proclaimed Tea Party members were in Congress. By contrast, the 2011 Occupy Movement lived hard and died fast, never making real headway in DC, with the exception of a brief stint on K Street where protestors occupied the buildings of lobbyists as a statement against the influence of money in politics.

Without Bernie’s unwavering, and, for some, somewhat relentless hammering of the issue, outcry against America’s widening economic chasm would not have made its way as it did into campaign debate, news coverage, and everyday conversation.

Granted, several obstacles remain: we have yet to see the extent to which a Hillary Clinton administration will continue to push for that progressive of an agenda (I’m too desperately optimistic to even consider a Trump agenda), and the ability for any sort of substantive policy change to take root, a steep obstacle in today’s partisan politics.

But in this moment, there is reason to recognize and appreciate that inequality, which is at unprecedented levels since the eve of the Great Depression, is at least on the agenda in ways that have largely escaped institutionalized politics outside of the usual nod to the “middle class.”

The Pope

the pope 2

As one of the most influential people in the world, the leader of some 1.2 billion Catholics, the Pope has exhibited humility among the poor; concern for the environment; and acceptance of gays and lesbians. In this most recent act, he asks for forgiveness from those who have been wronged by the Church. Some highlights below.

On civil rights and human dignity:

“I think that the Church not only should apologize … to a gay person whom it offended but it must also apologize to the poor as well, to the women who have been exploited, to children who have been exploited by (being forced to) work. It must apologize for having blessed so many weapons… We Christians have to apologize for so many things, not just for this (treatment of gays), but we must ask for forgiveness, not just apologize! Forgiveness!”

On the environment:

Rich countries are destroying poor ones, and the earth is getting warmer. “The warming caused by huge consumption on the part of some rich countries has repercussions on the poorest areas of the world, especially Africa, where a rise in temperature, together with drought, has proved devastating for farming.”

Technocratic domination leads to the destruction of nature and the exploitation of people, and “by itself the market cannot guarantee integral human development and social inclusion.”

Individuals must act. “An integral ecology is also made up of simple daily gestures which break with the logic of violence, exploitation and selfishness,” he writes. We should also consider taking public transit, car-pooling, planting trees, turning off the lights and recycling.

Christians have misinterpreted Scripture and “must forcefully reject the notion that our being created in God’s image and given dominion over the earth justifies absolute domination over other creatures.”

On equality and concern for the poor:

Just as the commandment “Thou shalt not kill” sets a clear limit in order to safeguard the value of human life, today we also have to say “thou shalt not” to an economy of exclusion and inequality. Such an economy kills. How can it be that it is not a news item when an elderly homeless person dies of exposure, but it is news when the stock market loses two points? This is a case of exclusion. Can we continue to stand by when food is thrown away while people are starving? This is a case of inequality.

The culture of prosperity deadens us; we are thrilled if the market offers us something new to purchase. In the meantime, all those lives stunted for lack of opportunity seem a mere spectacle; they fail to move us.

In this context, we can understand Jesus’ command to his disciples: “You yourselves give them something to eat!” (Mk 6:37): it means working to eliminate the structural causes of poverty and to promote the integral development of the poor, as well as small daily acts of solidarity in meeting the real needs which we encounter.

The dignity of each human person and the pursuit of the common good are concerns which ought to shape all economic policies.